Agents can build it.Can your team decide, trust and pay for it?

Running agents is solved; the tools do it. What separates teams now are five decisions agents can't make for you. Scroll, and watch a team's shape change.

1/5Product bets

From Same roadmap, fasterto Data decides what stays

Usage data and evals decide what stays. Kill rate and learning per week are tracked as closely as delivery.

Assisted Compounding

2/5Autonomy

From Step by stepto Autonomy set by evidence

How far agents may run is set per task class from measured success rates, and changed as models change.

Assisted Compounding

3/5Trust

From Line-by-line reviewto Gates tuned by data

Escaped defects and incidents are measured per change class, and gates are tightened or relaxed from that data.

Assisted Compounding

4/5Economics

From Seats per personto Compute as production cost

Build, buy, agent or hire is decided on cost per outcome. Spend is reviewed like any other production cost.

Assisted Compounding

5/5Organization

From Tools mandatedto Shape set by data

Team shape, hiring and budget are revised from measured data. What agents learn flows back into skills and onboarding.

Assisted Compounding

This is the shape worth building.What shape is yours?

Find out your team's shapeComing soon

Why now.

12×

more merged changes a day at Anthropic between May and September 2026. Source control, builds and CI became the bottleneck.

Anthropic Engineering, Oct 2026

12h vs 1–3h

Frontier models finish 12-hour tasks half the time, but only 1 to 3-hour tasks at 80% reliability. How far agents run should follow what you can verify.

METR, Sep 2026

1 in 5

code reviews on GitHub now involves an agent, while approval stays with people.

GitHub, May 2026